I am disappointed in you @Anaximines. I have more respect for your intelligence than to have thought you were capable of putting out such a set of misleading, trite, and trivial questions. But of course, because you are bright - unlike some downrampers who will remain nameless, you are, in fact, intellectually capable - what I should have said was that I didn’t think you were morally capable.
Your post resembles the far-right MAGA legislators who are asking these types of “give me a yes or no” questions in their so-called House “investigations” in the U.S. where they equate social programs with communism and authoritarianism and when it is these same far-right idiots that are exhibiting controlling characteristics and yearning for authoritarianism. Your questions appear to me take a position that because a group of people is part of what should be a respected government/quasi-government organisation, they could not break the law, be self-serving, or carry out activities that are plainly immoral. One only has to take a look at the robo-debt scheme to see that people who we put in positions of power are capable of abusing that power for “the party”, political, or personal reasons.
I and several others could answer all of your questions and still support ISX, but we have done that already - several times. So if you are really interested in serious non-trivial answers, I invite you to go look them up. But I don’t think you will do that. You were more interested in looking clever than in attempting to get to any truth.
Shame on you.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?