ASIC v ISX Hearing, page-218

Thanks for your post@itzgr82balive but I really have to disagree with you. I don't see how these questions are in any way misleading, trite or trivial.

Explain just one - was the ASX legally wrong to suspend ISX, or two, wrong to maintain the suspension? ISX pretended to fight a court case on this and folded. ASX did nothing wrong legally and you need to accept that and move on.

The MAGA comment you accuse me of far more resembles the behavior of the ISX Base. Trump once said "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, OK?". If JK shot someone on Collins street, there would be a handful of vociferous defenders here on hot copper to justify it. This resembles zealotry, cognitive dissonance and the proper use of the word opinionated. In your case, you construct elegant arguments but dwell in a hovel beneath their shadow because your conclusions appear to me to be determined well before you construct your arguments.

And this is just a senseless accusation "Your questions appear to me take a position that because a group of people is part of what should be a respected government/quasi-government organisation, they could not break the law, be self-serving, or carry out activities that are plainly immoral. "

You are now saying that I am the opposite of MAGA? Make your mind up.

I am saying (through the questions I asked) that so many different organisations have to be corrupt, collaborating and conspiring such that with each new organisation you add to the conspiracy, the probability of it being correct diminishes - this is just probability maths. The ASX is corrupt and acting in conspiracy with OM - Oh ASIC is in on it too and corrupt. The ATO just joined the party...bla bla - add Visa.

The pattern is unmistakable