Risk of exploration failure at Lockyer-2 and North Erregulla Deep-1 project.
Reward from maintaining exposure to the Lockyer project with consolidated ownership.
These really seem at odds with each other lol.
If exploration was really going to fail, why would MIN be expressing exposure as a Reward?
Upcoming Spud of Lockyer2, page-164
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)