magnificent mondy, page-40

PT20

I thought I replied but can't see it.

Thanks for your info.

By the way I may have put up a wrong chart the other day. I was talking about Armstrong cycles from the 2003 and probably posted a chart with other cycles. The 8.6 month cycle has always been a low while the 392/3 day cycle alternates low to high.

Anyway I suggested May 12 should be a low of some sort based on 8.6 month cycles.

If you want to get "pure" about it, 8.6 months isn't special because it matches 8.6 years but because it is 1/12th of the major cycle, a major vibration.

So if you take 10 X 8.6 months (or 10 X 1/12th of 8.6 years) the precise date is really May 13.

Because 8.6 months X 10 is 86 months.

86 months from 13/03/2003 is 13/05/2010.

But you have to allow a day or two.