Just to clarify further Davidcall. There is a difference between a traditional takeover. In a traditional takeover, as KKR is attempting, the bidder sets the limit of acceptances. Eg they may want 50% , 90% , 100% or simply enough shares to gain influence on the board. With a scheme arrangement, as TAG is attempting ,it’s all or nothing. If the scheme is approved TAG would get 100% of shares, if it’s rejected they are left with the shares they already own ie potentially 0%. If only 74% of shares vote for the scheme, it fails and they get 0% of those shares.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- IHR
- Ann: Bidder's Statement
Ann: Bidder's Statement, page-19
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add IHR (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CCO
THE CALMER CO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Anthony Noble, MD & CEO
Anthony Noble
MD & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online