Why Keating is incorrect to appease China, page-38

First 38 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
dragut

2,200 Posts.

20/03/23

12:26

Post #: 66856796
Share

Originally posted by Batmansdaughter: ↑

Yes dontaskme

it seems somewhat ludicrous to suggest that China would invade Australia. But please let me tell you something about myself so that I'm not mistaken for a 'yellow invasion' Hanson ignoramus, or a simple racist.

I'm married to a Vietnamese. One child born there. I've lived overseas, mostly in Europe for a quarter of my adult life. I've lived and travelled SE Asia extensively. I love the Chinese peolpe. I very much dislike the CCP.

My theory of a Chinese military invasion on Australia is the concluion of an argument based on three premises that are reasonable, and potentially true.

Premise 1: China will be at war with Australia when they attempt to take Taiwan. Australian military vessels are already near there, and China have warned us that we will 'taste the bitter pill.'

Premise 2: the presence of the US 7th Fleet based in Japan since the end of WW2 is the principle obstacle in China's way of claiming Taiwan for themselves (and probably taking Japan too after WW2). But the single 7th Fleet and minor allies cannot necessarily withstand the full might of the entire Chinese military in their own backyard, and the war may become another Pearl Harbour event.

Premise 3: When at war with China, all Chinese owned assetts in Australia return to the Commonwealth. China will totally reject this as they believe we are the aggressor.

Conclusion: If China defeats the 7th Fleet and its allies over Taiwan, then they will invade Australia to take back what they believe is rightfully theirs, by their legal purchase within Australian law. As such, they will then occupy indefinitely (until removed), the northern half of Australia.

Expand

Nuclear strike will begin when the Yankees lost all its vessels in the west Pacific. The only thing that will ever land on Australian and American soil from PLA are nukes after vice versa.
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Palladium's the newest geopolitical hot commodity. But ASX exposure is limited

Week 44 Wrap: Relatively boring week ahead of US election; HotCopper's most watched; Oz inflation at 3.5%

Bitcoin hits fresh record as instos pile into BTC ETFs – and Trump helps, too

MIN

Ellison slapped with $20M sanction from MinRes but will stay on as leader – for now

MIN

Movers and Shakers: Zip Co, MinRes, Kuniko, more – The week's top ASX gainers

There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...

First 38 Last

Why Keating is incorrect to appease China, page-38

Palladium's the newest geopolitical hot commodity. But ASX exposure is limited

Week 44 Wrap: Relatively boring week ahead of US election; HotCopper's most watched; Oz inflation at 3.5%

Bitcoin hits fresh record as instos pile into BTC ETFs – and Trump helps, too

Ellison slapped with $20M sanction from MinRes but will stay on as leader – for now

Movers and Shakers: Zip Co, MinRes, Kuniko, more – The week's top ASX gainers

Featured News

Featured News

Why Keating is incorrect to appease China, page-38

Top Stories

Palladium's the newest geopolitical hot commodity. But ASX exposure is limited

Week 44 Wrap: Relatively boring week ahead of US election; HotCopper's most watched; Oz inflation at 3.5%

Bitcoin hits fresh record as instos pile into BTC ETFs – and Trump helps, too

Ellison slapped with $20M sanction from MinRes but will stay on as leader – for now

Movers and Shakers: Zip Co, MinRes, Kuniko, more – The week's top ASX gainers

Featured News

Featured News