Competitive landscape, page-3570

"As much as it pains me to say it, Qualcomm and Prophesee are using Synesense tech".

What do you base this on? You seem to be under the misapprehension that Qualcomm would only be able to utilise Prophesee's event based camera if it was hooked up to either Akida or Synsense processors. This is false.

I have already posted about this so I am not sure why you are still mixed up (see here)

Again, I suggest you watch the following clip from the 37 minute mark onwards. The CEO of Prophesee could not be any clearer. He says that while ultimately it would make sense to hook up their camera to a neuromorphic chip, this solution is note quite mature enough yet. To solve the issue of using their event based camera with non-neuromorphic chips they adopt a pragmatic engineering approach and can use different representations of the "event" to make it fit better with the non-neuromorphic architectures.

In other words, Qualcomm does not need either Akida nor Synsense to make use of Prophesee's event based camera.

What I find hard to understand is why you recommend BRN to your friends and family (as you have posted before) when it is clear you do not have a relevant engineering background to help you get a good grasp of the technology yourself?

In my view, the BRN share price has been inflated by naïve retail investors with no relevant engineering background who blindly believe all the frenzied ramping on social media and stock market forums that BRN is an almost sure fire way to enormous wealth.