Ann: Site update - Proof of Concept Projects , page-4

Hi white pointer.

Page 2.Said Mining has not been started at Kuja.
Going to do bulk crushing and screening trials on site to quantify the potential crusher performance of the ores,and to provide indications of any contamination and likely ROM head grades.What if the grade is too low and contaminants too high? Should have found out about contaminants and grade in their due diligence processes.

Mangal. Water from off site needed.
What are they going to do if they have to do wet crushing and screening of the iron ore?
How have they been grading with out knowing impurities levels?

How did they come by the initial contamination figures in the iron ores that they made the decision to commence "bulk " mining at Mangal?They now say the insitu contamination in the ROM ores presented to the screening plant is not consistent with their initial assessments.

The impurities are impacting significantly on the final Hematite grades.

Moving the mining fleet to areas of the lease with greater confidence in the geological model. The lease is only just over 6 hectares in size.

First shipment fourth quarter of 2010 (October to December)

Resource definition.
I thought they had already done the drilling program.
Ground geophysics,surface mapping,trenching and core drilling proposed for both sites.
The resource definition is expected to be completed in the last quarter of 2010 (October to December).

Classing the 6000 tonnes of low grade as carpet losses in the port project.So no iron ore in a stock pile at the port.

Still no results from the drill cores they said they had sent back to Australia for laboratory testing.

Are you being told every thing?

Regards
Westcott.