Would it be unreasonable to expect management to publicly address the changes (all negative) to inferred / grades / tonnes previously released (as gospel, under ASX guidelines) and now reassessed and re released with this announcement?
I appreciate there is a new geo looking at things but why would he have gone back over the information previously released under stringent guidelines and re assessed them? I'd like to know under whose instruction this was instigated and the big one, WHY?
General Chat, page-5935
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2,242 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add NVA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
19.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $53.26M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 18.5¢ | 19.8¢ | 18.5¢ | $44.45K | 231.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 88199 | 19.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 20.0¢ | 34133 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 14.20pm 12/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NVA (ASX) Chart |