The Voice, page-82

Freedom of speech doesn't mean that I have an obligation to listen to or believe what is being said

Despite having a very low opinion of most politicians, I don't believe the voice is in the best interests of about 97% of Australians. It certainly doesn't serve the best insterest of the lower socio economic first nations people living in remote Australia but it does provide a gilded trough for the elite first nations that reside in the capital cities as well as a gilded future for the non indigenous virtue signaling hangers on. It will also provide a bottomless pit of funding for the legal profession in Australia.

The voice will not close the gap.
The voice will not alleviate the pronounced problems of the indigenous in remote Australia
As there are hundredds of ''mobs'' throughout Australia - the voice will not provide the same level of representation as they now have through normal parliamentary representation. It will be a question of ''selection'' rather then ''election ''

Overall - from what I have learnt from the available information so far - the voice is nothing other that a first step on the road to apartheid in this country.

If any European country had a 'voice' referendum, it would have been howled down as racist.

Have a look in the mirror and be proud of who you are and not what others want you to be