Banter and general comments, page-141

No idea if you are right. IMO we don’t have enough information other than a few 2-d figures to be sure of any theory.

This may be a stupid comment - figure 2 shows the surface projection of the 201 to 204 drill holes which are under AP012 which is why I am puzzled posters referring to holes 201 etc drilling under AP011.

Note in figure 1 what seems to be a pegmatite surface expression (thin reddish line at surface starting just to the right of the fault line) - maybe AP012? They have not drilled through AP012 from the surface ie from a shallow depth and if they do I assume they will identify shallow pegmatites as you suggest ie where your dotted 1 is - we don’t know how thick they will be - it is possible they will be thicker than your drawing of 1 since AP012 is quite long and the bottom of your area 2 is about 150m down vertically -your area 1 could even continue from surface to the top of area 2 as it is untested, since AP012 starts at surface just to the right of the fault and continues for 600m to 700m and a large part of AP012 is 100m wide - but we don’t yet know.

My comments in the above para are very very speculative but if I happened to be on the money and grade is 1%+ (an extremely small probability) then it would be a big resource.

They are drilling Hole 205 (I assume it will have a shallow dip) to the left of hole 201 in figure 2 (not shown in figure 2)- the results may confirm your theory or not about the thrust.

Anyway if my thoughts are off the mark just tell and maybe explain why.