What is your concern with non-holders posting?
~ considering you have for years posted on stocks you don't own? or did own but sentiment indicated otherwise?
Specifically if it is information sharing/awareness, or you comfortable with posters providing incorrect information?
example: @wombat074 post 67238938
re: "AVZ doesn't have to say sh1t until it is good and ready."
Although this will probably continue to occur as the ASX only recourse for this type of breach is sending it to ASIC, but again I am surprised that moving forward Listing Rule 3.1A hasn't been applied by the Company.
++ As a shareholder, do you prefer to have your information provided by a third party (AFR) versus the official means of Company announcements via the ASX platform?
Continuous Disclosure obligations still apply regardless of the company being in suspension:
ASX Listing Rule 3.1 - 3.1B, Guidance Note 8 ~ 3.23 Suspended entities;
++ Entities whose securities have been suspended from trading continue to be subject to the Listing Rules, including their continuous disclosure obligations under Listing Rule 3.1.88
https://www.asx.com.au/documents/rules/Guidance_Note_8.pdf
cheers
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?