It does not say 2 of the 3 men arrived, it says zero in that regards.1 The two angels arrived at Sodom in the evening
2 “My lords (not Lord)
,” he said,
3 But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate.
Bread is the bread for the angels, men and the Lord
5 They called to Lot, “Where are the men (now not angels) who came to you tonight?
Well the 3rd one is somewhere else. Maybe he got a yeast infection from the bread?
no other option, we have to stick to only what the Bible shows usWe finally agree on something wotsup.
= we don't know if the 3 men arrived in Sodom.There were 2 men but they were angels who were men.
It's like the Lord is a man who wrestled with Jacob.
The Lord was 3 men who Abraham addressed as Lord and fed them with 3 breads at which one may have got a yeast infection and turned the other 2 into angels. It isn't conclusively definitive. The ancients have this style of writing as such.
God only know why
So NO, there are not other ways to interpret, and claim truth.Yes, it is good you see you can't claim truth on your argument now. This has been my point all along. Now you reaslise you are a human being. Can't call you a liar now. Ummmm arrrrr DRRRRRRRRR..!!
