awright
An american group of doctors recommended it be allowed. From the article
Dr. Friedman Ross said that the committee members oppose all types of female genital cutting that impose risks or physical or psychological harm, and consider the ritual nick a last resort, but that the nick is supposed to be as benign as getting a girls ears pierced. Its taking a pin and creating a drop of blood.
So I think it is meant to be almost entirely symbolic. I'm still against it though
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/07/health/policy/07cuts.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
- Forums
- General
- genital mutilation of girls
genital mutilation of girls, page-36
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 44 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)