Ann: Information for Shareholders on Voluntary Administration, page-26

This is now a manilla game with with one side holding a handful or deuces and the other a royal flush with one card to play.
The conundrum is, GROW and Finran (Clee) aren't confident enough with theyre flush to match the bet and call out the hand, and the deuces are ill-gotten, so they don't care if they they lose as they just startup again, and again.
Clee to date hasn't called ouwrongdoings, they relied on process, intellect, but in this devils playground you need balls. The banker (pwc) couldn't care less, holding the bank the longer he holds or the higher the bet the better the banker ($850ph and $450ph secretary) comes off, best outcome for pwc is they all walk away and they get to carve up the prize and pocket everything left.
The call is now with Clee group, either put up the stake or play the process and lose what they've staked.
I ask CLEE, what are you protecting or afraid of, put up $5m, cover the debts and show good faith by offering up the 2 quarters of cash flow in advance. (Asx relist rules include significant cash flow) Im sure, without a doubt the majority of holders would support a CR post eviction at egm of the unconsumable to cover the costs.
What if you already know the next card extended that FLUSH? Set up a class action trust today, don't dilly dally.

Don't cower to these crooks, beat them at thier game.

FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE
Over to Finran, clee, grow.