Dalai Lama, page-1004

''And what is crock from you is that you victim blame a humanitarian who was the source of inspiration for thousands upon thousands of souls due to His loving kindness and luminary teachings to side with a person who has clearly been shown by each and every Bahai at the time to be a conscious source of attack and disintegration and disunity.''

Victim blame? That's not true. I merely point to the history of the religion and the issues that it has faced, posting articles, quotes and references to Baha'i documents which are readily confirmed in the Baha'i online library. Of course, there are plenty of rationales on offer for all too human failures, including your own, but nothing that negates the point that the Baha'i org was started and is run by people as fallible as any other, that your prophet is not God, that redefining the terms does not transform any man into a God, and that contrary to the claims, the Baha’i principles are not unique and that the Baha’i leaders didn’t always act according to these principles. That's all.

''I consciously IGNORE that Abdul-Baha had nothing to do with the actions of Muhammad Ali.''

Not sure what your point is, but you tend to consciously ignore a whole lot of inconvenient truths. It looks like a bad habit.

''The fact that you blame a victim of crimes to suit your agenda.''

Emotional and defensive. Pointing out what happened is not an agenda, nor is there any blame involved, just history as it was recorded.