if you refer to my previous post just then you can see why not holding doesn’t matter. There’s other benefits to supporting a disruptive stock like this and the first one that comes to mind is what it could mean in the green energy space and how that could help save the planet. Then there’s the jobs and everything else that comes with creating new business. If you consider that this could sit amongst efts and in peoples superannuation then you could consider that supporting this helps lay the platform for peoples future.
I’ve never shorted and wouldn’t on a stock like this when the world is screaming out for this tech. Same as LPD which I hate but I’d totally support the company if it could deliver jobs etc.. to me that’s a lifestyle stock but if they could break free and deliver who would want to prevent that.
it’s such a simple persons view that discussing a stock and even supporting one even though someone didn’t hold is even an issue. I like the stock but my strategy as an investor is not dictated by what people think about me.. there’s no pressure.
Also if you consider the question I threw at Uncle Rico and Jerry you can see that it’s not just about gains on stock. It’s about supporting a technology that can make a difference. Think of what this company and others could do for a country like Argentina that live below the poverty line.. the jobs it could create.. etc. then think about the tech and how that could reduce the footprint and the size of the land they use for lithium projects.
but clap yourselves in shorters.. you could actually preventing something that’s life changing by doing what you do. I absolutely loved seeing people shorting this get crushed. Not because they lost money. But because it means the project has merit.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)