ASN General Discussion, page-11638

I'm not emotional at all about ASN - far from it.... staring down the barrel of losing my father having recently lost a brother.... pfft I really couldn't give a flying FiretrUCK about this company right now.

Albeit I am a bit annoyed and bewildered by the rudeness, ignorance and straight out denial from some people on here.... and the allegations of ulterior motives being levelled at people for simply stating facts or asking questions. Shame.

I don't hold any options. Never have had options in any company.

I am not concerned about the timeline.... every company experiences delays. It is what it is.

Communication is poor... as with most companies. It is what it is.

I have no motivation other than seeking the honest truth.... which I obtained by writing to the BLM and I copied their reply on here.

The simple fact is that the company has announced on at least 4 occasions (25/1, 22/3, 4/5 and 8/5) that they have approval to re-enter the wells at Sunburst #1 and Mineral Canyon Fed 1-3. The company has not re-entered these wells because the approval (although previously granted) has been set aside.... it's been posted on here, it's on the BLM site, it's been confirmed by email from BLM.

The stone cold denial and behaviour from some has left me bewildered.

I think a company (ANY company, not just this one) should tell it's shareholders immediately if a previously announced approval has been set aside by the regulatory body who granted said approval.

Once again I copy below the email reply from BLM... for those who do not understand, the Decision Record IS the approval and the Decision (approval) has been set aside at the moment.

STOP ARGUING ABOUT A STRAIGHT OUT, BLACK AND WHITE, CLEAR ENGLISH INDISPUTABLE FACT!!! FFS!!



Hopefully the company tells us when a new Decision is issued, rather than a shareholder needing to find it out from the BLM and announce it on social media.

GOOD LUCK TO US ALL.