WR1 Leapfroggers, page-80

Reviving this thread. While commentary on every up and down tick is obviously riveting, maybe we can revisit the question of WR1's mineral resource, and keep the conversation going.

I see @WowVeryJosh has now decreased his estimate of Adina's current tonnage in a reddit post, from "40-50mt" to "32mt +/- 3". Interesting, considering no new data has been released between these two estimates.

It could just be the result of further refinement of his model, however Josh doesn't share the detailed model publicly. Maybe that will change, and Josh will post his model here, despite the obvious (and imo somewhat justified) contempt he has for "HC boomers" and diarists. What do you say, Josh?

I've also previously asked Josh basically to give us a free lesson on how tonnage estimates are reached, and (aside from modeling the physical orebody) what variables we're dealing with that could significantly alter these estimates. Still got my fingers crossed he'll come back to us on that.

As a reminder, we have @Helios11 who says he's engaged two geos to model the deposit, and that both suggest 50-60mt for current main zone tonnage, including un-assayed footwall intercepts (do I have that right?)

@Gainzmaster5000 says he's a geo but not a specialist modeler, and iirc suggested 100mt as an "exploration target" based on unclear future assumptions. (Imo would've been more helpful to see where his model landed using current data. Any update, GM?)

And (for whatever it's worth) the MD of nearology play C1X also suggested Adina is "50-100mt" in a recent presentation.