Anyone here have any experience in patents.
1-5, 9-14, 16-17, 21-26, 28-29 do not involve an inventive step and hence don't comply whereas claims for 6-8, 15, 18-20 and 27 do.
Does this mean we need more data to substantiate the first claims or do we proceed, get the patents for the steps that do comply and then resubmit.
Seems like a mammoth process to then be rejected across so many areas.
General Comments / Chat, page-7698
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3,440 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RAC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.88 |
Change
0.025(1.35%) |
Mkt cap ! $319.4M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.85 | $1.89 | $1.85 | $74.38K | 39.92K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18943 | $1.85 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.88 | 199 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 17/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RAC (ASX) Chart |