Ann: Suspension from Quotation, page-26

it just confuses me as to why the Carbine board would appear to want to give away any part of a world class high purity/low impurity silica sand asset not granted under the current MLA , which by the way has been determined , using the shareholders investment cash over the past two years and pegged by the board as the most important portion of their only asset ........for nothing ...... thats right $0

i mean they must know these tenements cost money ...... they just bought an inferior silica sand resource tenement for the equivalent of $800,000 , so the company just paid to swap a great resource to get one thats worse than the one it had . ?????? this doesnt make sense there must be another reason

now thats not just a mistake by the board it's incompetence at a minimum and Carbine shareholders need to put a stop to this