PLL General Discussion, page-1310

See, there you go, you can actually put some substance into your posts. That's a change from most of our visitors from across yonder (I don't count the looney that drops in here from time to time as one of yours!).

Unfortunately, your quote only occurs once, and the assessment of downstream Li chemical production options occurs a couple of times including in the Summary of Use of funds at the end of the announcement. Which one trumps the other? Reckon all that shows is that BL and SYA mgmt have again highlighted their amateurish professionalism in their comms.

The biggest issue I see with your 'carbonate will be first' comment as a lay down misere, is that it comes from a SYA viewpoint. If I'm not mistaken, SYAQ is a separate entity to SYA and is involved in a JV with a third party. As a separate entity, which has no direct ties to Moblan (only indirectly via SYA) or any other future possible hydroxide option ATM, it's my view it will be compelled to consider it's best processing options for its own future - not what might happen at Moblan or anywhere else. Anyway, it's my view that what SYA has now stated - that it will be assessing downstream options - is probably a lot closer to what will happen in reality. And I don't for a second think it's a win/win if downstream processing of Li carb is what is put forward by SYAQ without considering a hydroxide option, because of the value of the OTA.

And that's when the fight started.....