China you say:
"When this Project was first looked at by Ashton in May 1992 they recognised that there was a problem with Radiation in the Pit"
I am assuming that your above is your very own fabricated interpretation.
Nowhere do I see that they have "recognised that there was a problem" as you would like those reading here to believe.
You also said:
"and accordingly limited any Mine Worker to no more than 30 days per annum !"
I would suggest that in the spirit of posting here, that you quote as to what is actually said, and in its full entirety, especially to whom it is relation to.
I am assuming that the below (Quoted) from the review bypassed your objective negativity that you have poorly attempted to peddle here.
"The concentration of the uranium in the Mount Weld ore is close to that of background levels, and radon emissions would be only about four times those from an area of soil of a size comparable to the mine pit. Thoron levels would be approximately forty-three times greater than those from this area of soil but, at these concentrations, would not present a significant source of radiation exposure in an open-cut mine." "would not present a significant source of radiation exposure in an open-cut mine."
And another from the review:
"Under Ashton's commitment to the ALARA principle, radiation protection designs targets to be adopted for all employees would be less than 2 mSv/a and would not require designation of employees as radiation workers, which would allow a 20 mSv/a dose limit under the International Commission on Radiological Protection draft recommendations (1990)." "and would not require designation of employees as radiation workers"
I could go a lot further, but I'm pretty sure that most here are used to critters crawling in here attempting to stir the pot.
imo - Our resident pot stirrer (CJ) here will not be outdone by any fool attempting to topple him.
Also doesn't take much to source out Lynas's very detailed and professional Radiation Management Plan/s, where one would quickly realise that you are attempting to sow doubt here with uneducated BS.
SMSL?
In the spirit of posting,
Have a great day, and may the share price cost you dearly if you are shorting!!!
Lynas is NOT Ashton.
And we are now in 2023 NOT 1992.
.
LYC Price at posting:
$7.78 Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)