ho hummm, page-22

BHS - I don't think ronald mcrabbit owns the stock (or so it says)

I struggle sometimes with the extreme negativity and lack of any balanced perspective by some posters. I can understand why holders are at times too positive, over-optimistic, perhaps even somewhat positively biased because they clearly have a vested interest in the stock and so by definition have a positive bias.

But non-holder views I just don't get. They more than anyone are in the best position to provide balanced objective two-sided thinking because they are in effect neutral in terms of their exposure to a stock.

The motivation to constantly post extreme negative views such as those by Ronald Mcdonald's long-eared pet, I just don't get. I would have thought that if you had no interest in a stock because you think it is a dog, would cause you to stay away / completely ignore the MEO threads. Why the bunny keeps visiting the forum of a stock that it has no time or interest in baffles me.

In conclusion, the bunny burger either:
a) is telling porky pies and deep down loves MEO but has trouble in communicating its true feelings
b) somehow thinks it can impact sentiment by talking it down (hoping to secretly buy cheap)
c) actually already owns MEO but has sado-masochistic tendencies and loves to talk down its own investments
d) is lonely and seeks attention by stirring up trouble
e) has scar tissue after MEO in the past skinned the rabbit and it somehow hates the idea that anyone else could benefit from the very thing that harmed it. If I go down, you're all going with me!

I think non-holders should have to declare their reason for interest on HC. For holders the reason for interest is obvious - they own it!

Mcchicken burgers are bad enough...but Mcrabbit...that's just ridiculous.