Charts, page-3994

I really didn't want to get involved in the recent discussion. I don't do requests, especially if I am suss about the true motives of posters.
Old hands will know my loathing of shorts and their disgusting use of sites like this to bend the minds of investors but more importantly traders targeting disruptive tech like WBT and my first unicorn ISX.
I can confirm that court documents revealed a long term poster with a large following with regular top 5 daily posts on the ISX threads was also a shorters plant or turncoat. That would be akin to Harmattom or Fectional siding with shorters in a short raid involving unprecedented selling pressure.
So posters arriving just before WBT shorts massively increased and then posting at high volume while asking leading questions is a massive red flag. When a poster asks the size of my holding, something nobody has ever done, as it is nobody's business IMO it is another red flag. To then ask me to do a comparison with another company seems agenda driven. I have done a comparison in the past but it was more about valuation than chart structure. LTHolders will know that some BRN holders who hold WBT were not happy with this and I have never done it again. And finally a poster who makes using the ignore function harder by limiting who see his profile is a massive red flag. Beware.
So no comparison but will leave holders with the numbers. The MCap of BRN reached $4bill approx at the top, NVX reached $6bill at the top. At $4bill WBT would be $20/share and at $6bill $30/share approx based on 195000000 SOI approx. Investors need to decide if WBT has a technology that is more valuable than those other companies and if that value can sustain the SP going forward.
If the answer in the majority of investor minds is yes and the lack of selling pressure other than shorts tends to agree then shorts may get destroyed this time rather than ltholding Investors and I know we will all be cheering that outcome with me cheering loudest obviously.