so with all the different results from different modelling frames, surely this demonstrates just how inaccurate such "predictive" scenarios fail to delivery competent results.
such a wide variation reveals nothing other than inaccuracy.
the problem is that there are too many variables to input into the models, and such variables are so unpredictable that even the fluttering of the wings of a butterfly can throw out predictions by a wide range.
so obviously modelling is only an educated guess, while the physics describes the dynamic of global warming and the effect of climate change. we don't need predictions to know that climate change is dangerous and damaging. and we are seeing the danger and damage almost weekly with greater extremes of weather systems, and bizarre departures from "normal" climatic conditions.
