That's BS.
Any matter can be taken to the High Court due to a perceived lack of consultation and then the haggling over secondary issues. You give us this and we'll drop that action etc.
I've told you a 1000 times the negative effects it will have on our governance and I've pointed out that some of the players are malicious but you prefer to stay in Fairyland.
If they wanted just a Voice then be prepared as a contingency to accept a legislated one which would be just as effective (if at all) as a Voice by referendum. Remember that gap needs filling.
But the tone and shrill from Burney and the like demonstrate that it's not just about a Voice and closing the gap by consultation. There is a broader agenda to wrestle the Country back and reek revenge. This from the city-dwelling intellectuals on well-paid tax-payer funded jobs within the 'industry'. Meanwhile, the poor native in the Bush endures the gap.
Always was, always will be. Use their laws against them. Submarines to parking-tickets. Already own 50% of the land mass. $30B in annual rent. All those industry jobs. All those organisations within the industry. Compare them to PNG people.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Fiona Stanley on the Voice
Fiona Stanley on the Voice, page-358
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Iggy Tan, Executive Chairman
Iggy Tan
Executive Chairman
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online