Ann: Quarterly Activities Report and Appendix 5B Jun 2023, page-9

https://www.azeusconvene.co.uk/blog/what-is-the-difference-between-shareholders-and-stakeholders
- a useful read although I think it makes me - as a shareholder - out to be a somewhat irrelevant non-entity with only profiteering in mind and no interest in the long term health of the company or environmental social governance. … Humph to that although I do see that the local community would count as more relevant stake holders, whether they own shares or not .


FWIW As to the rest - about $16.5m left to spend which is an estimated five quarters worth of support?
Given that $11.5 of that is from the recent capital raise (less $766,000 to Bridge St and Ashanti Capital) it seems the raise was very timely.

And the EPA issues drag on ….
FWIW over at Hastings Technology Metals I saw that about two weeks after it achieved initial EPA approvals [ 17/01/22 ] it received it’s first NAIF loan of $140m [ 02/02/22 ] (now bumped up to $220m as of [ 17/01/23 ])
…So things may move quickly here too following the approval?

- regards when the approval might be given, it appears all the stakeholders have to now agree to the current (updated) environmental review document, then - if they do not, it will need to be updated again….​

:/
And then when everyone is on the same page the ERD will need to go to the EPA to go on it’s “to do” list?​

. . ho hum..​

As one of those irrelevant and ‘potentially avaricious-minded, intent-on-pillaging, non stakeholder’ shareholders (but maybe Regal fits that Viking warlord description better) I realise my views don’t matter, but still I am wondering - like others here - how many more quarters it will take before maiden EPA approvals are stamped, but also feeling pleased that early works are progressing on site and wondering if more bargain prices are on the way or if there might be other news in the pipeline to support the price.


cheers

​