well thats what you said. everyone should be granted the assumption on innocence. You dont need evidence to prove yourself innocent. your comment said he was granted innocence
you also have your blinkers on - how on Earth was Lehrman supposed to be giving a fair trial with the media and high profile individuals jumping immediately to her side and paraded around like a national hero?
if you believe innocence until proven guilty then you need to admit he is currently innocent.
And lets get this straight - it wasn't Lehrman who went out in front of cameras and sprayed this story all over the news. Given the seriousness of the charges it should never have reached the media to start with. Report after the fact to ensure fairness
