But consultation and respect are not relevant, Scott, that's just virtue-signalling in it purest form. It may give you a warm fuzzy but it doesn't help Indigenous Australia vis a vis the referendum. You said:
"the Voice will address and remove the prejudice and bias against first Aussies."
....but that is just garbage Scott, it's a lie. The Voice can do what your quote says only if the next government feels like it. The Voice can be ignored, ergo the Voice doesn't do anything that the Government of the day doesn't like. Period.
In that context the link you provided is useless. The Productivity Commission doesn't make policy, they make policy suggestions. Just like the Voice. All of which can be (and have been) ignored when it suits the Government.
This runaround garbage you're serving up still doesn't answer the simple question:
What is the difference between:
A) The Voice being legislated, and being abolished by the next Government, and
B) The Voice being constitutionalised, and being ignored by the next Government?
