The 'yes' mob are in full meltdown., page-140

First 140 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Scott th Ratbag

58,395 Posts.

666

27/07/23

14:11

Post #: 69015602
Share

Originally posted by Treefern: ↑

You're the one who continues to avoid answering the question, I'm only hounding you.

Even in this unnecessarily long post you have missed the point of my question entirely, let alone answered it.

"but any Gov which is concerned with wellbeing and productivity improvement will consider such representations and decide for themselves".

This is clear, Scott. No one disagrees with you. No one. Not me. Not racists. Not the Captain of the No team. We are all in agreeance with you that any Government that judges itself a champion of Indigenous Australia will consider such representations and decide for themselves. The Government gets to decide if they're "concerned with wellbeing and productivity improvement", Scott, not you.

Don't mistake my keen interest in actually getting an answer to this question that you still insist on avoiding with an inability to understand your constant avoidance.

So I ask you the qustion again, because you haven't answered it:

What is the difference between:

A) The Voice being legislated, and being abolished by the next Government, and

B) The Voice being constitutionalised, and being ignored by the next Government?

Expand

if you think I haven't answered your question, perhaps you need to rephrase and make points as to where you remain unclear from my answer.

yes you are "hounding you". ......... is this just for trolling fun p'raps?
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 019 – Dreaming of the 9,000s

ASX Market Close: Iron awe keeps the XJO tracking along

Japan tariff deal inked at 15% – as long as US gets half a trillion of investment

TLX

Telix sinks as US regulator SEC issues subpoena over claims

TMG

Trigg brings famed Finnish metals refiner – and its tech – onboard to bolster antimony processing