"Once the Voice is operational, only then will Treaty become a debate to be considered"
Why is that Scott? Why does the Voice have to be constitutionalised for Treaty to be able to be considered? Why can't it be considered with a legislated Voice to Parliament?
The 'yes' mob are in full meltdown., page-168
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)