Ann: June 2023 Quarterly Activities Report & Cash Flow Report, page-71

Anyone care to share their thoughts on why they pivoted to the MobileMT survey from previously planned original drill program? What would have tempted them to pursue this mid-program and add to data they already have from previous air-borne EM survey? Not that they needed to publish from the offset if this was their plan all along and so it does beg the question of why pivot in this direction and why now. And I would also like to think that this is not some new you beaut tech they've only come across now. They must know about its value/success rates to warrant the additional spend. But to my limited understanding, I don't think they ever mentioned this additional survey before they announced it few weeks ago. It appears to me that something triggered them here.

Could it be that visuals of cores from 26, maybe early 27 were good enough to warrant this additional spend on top of drill costs? Or is frugality despaired at this stage to find the massive sulphides more quickly over the large MT area?

They cynical view of course might be that they hit dusters so want to find the massive sulphides even more quickly now, but the descriptive language/wordings used for 26 and in the quarterly doesn't seem to suggest this.

Did a poster yesterday/today say they spoke to CM about hole 27? Or did I hallucinate that?? Maybe they can shed some light on this if CM hinted at anything related to all this.