Albanese said at the outset he wanted to step back and leave the Yes! cases to grassroots Aboriginal people.
he wanted to avoid making it political. Dutton had other needs and ideas. a bit like John Howard's answer to drug abuse - "Just say No!" and he then set about making up all kind of nonsense.
but as for compensation, reparations or whatever name, Albanese was questioned severely by 2GB Fordham where he was asked and Albanese said an unequivocal No.
anything might be on the table when it comes to Treaty, which will be the subject for debate/negotiation after the Voice is established.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Voice does it mean compensation and returning stolen land
Voice does it mean compensation and returning stolen land, page-13
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 124 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
NEWS
Is oil undervalued?