Ann: Becoming a substantial holder, page-5

This question is neither for or against the spill . I had thought that the large nominee companies were how funds like Paradice and Ely Griffiths had their holdings .If those funds supported the spill, it would pass.
As to what the new CEO has done, IMO everything, or nearly everything, that has happened in the last few months had already been set in train by the previous management - the agreements with the health institutions to take SOZO's would have been the result of hundreds of hours of work before he took over. The belt tightening had also been set in train -
expenses will increase with extra employees, but that is inevitable. Those statements are neither for nor against the spill .
Do the people who will be presenting themselves as the fresh faces have to try to win us over like politicians, with statements of what they intend to do?(I am but a simple person.)