Serious question....and apologises if in wrong forum but I see a heap of people on here saying that negative posters are "paid by the insto's" or words to that effect.
Has there ever been any evidence of this? I mean on a large and consistent basis.
Clearly there are "hard fasts" both positive AND negative.
I see a hell of a lot of people here saying that the negative camp are simply "paid by the instos".
Could it not be that they are genuinely concerned by SYA performance? OR, could they just be narcissistic, bored people just looking for attention and they just feed off the endless replies of "go away" which ironically makes them hang around?
I am hardly a fan of the BOD with SYA but I am old enough to listen to both sides, save the squabbling, rubbish posts which unfortunately is a huge percentage at the moment.
Anyway, has there ever been an insto so willing to waste their money paying someone on HC to post crap all day that has been proved?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SYA
- Ann: First Shipment to Launch NAL Concentrate Revenues
Ann: First Shipment to Launch NAL Concentrate Revenues, page-244
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 206 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SYA (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
3.5¢ |
Change
0.004(12.9%) |
Mkt cap ! $360.2M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
3.2¢ | 3.7¢ | 3.2¢ | $3.583M | 104.2M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
37 | 5222047 | 3.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
3.6¢ | 3114773 | 17 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
37 | 5222047 | 0.035 |
27 | 15134780 | 0.034 |
26 | 7161292 | 0.033 |
30 | 10087485 | 0.032 |
31 | 9500991 | 0.031 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.036 | 3114773 | 17 |
0.037 | 5051036 | 20 |
0.038 | 7409477 | 15 |
0.039 | 4257398 | 22 |
0.040 | 6815496 | 25 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 30/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SYA (ASX) Chart |