What's your background? I am trying to find out where your cynicism has come from. What is a "pump" to a finance guy might be fact to a geologist or the opposite, an exploration geo with a career of no success can view everything negatively. Contextual understanding is key here.
How is it a pump if you have: 3 separate chalcocite ore bodies that are shallow and pittable (at a high level view). Now a large anomaly proven to host copper mineralisation, showing kilometre potential, with analogues across the tenure with the same signature as the proven exploration model, considered a pump?
Are pumps not 5m step out holes or drilling down dip?
If you had a proof on concept exploration model of success and consistent mineralisation would you not consider it a major discovery?
Or are you expecting 100m at 3% (true with 5m, whoops we drilled down dip)?
Please respond.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AW1
- Ann: Major Copper Discovery Confirmed at Storm
Ann: Major Copper Discovery Confirmed at Storm, page-370
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 272 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AW1 (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
12.0¢ |
Change
-0.003(2.04%) |
Mkt cap ! $62.18M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
12.0¢ | 12.0¢ | 11.5¢ | $44.27K | 371.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
6 | 566095 | 11.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
12.0¢ | 387054 | 5 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
6 | 566095 | 0.115 |
11 | 1034545 | 0.110 |
8 | 1596500 | 0.105 |
7 | 685061 | 0.100 |
1 | 200000 | 0.095 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.120 | 387054 | 5 |
0.125 | 192421 | 4 |
0.130 | 601334 | 4 |
0.135 | 543245 | 8 |
0.140 | 966319 | 9 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 05/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
AW1 (ASX) Chart |