Climate Change, page-102

All true mate - what I find entertaining though is that you guys all act like you are at the forefront of science - leading the charge for proofs on why the current consensus view on climate is wrong. This is sadly not the case. You've taken your science from your political leanings and the journalists that support as there is no strong scientific argument against the consensus view. Reading some stuff on the internet makes you nothing more than an armchair scientist that thinks your opinion has merit when it's really not worth a pinch of sh1t.

I know a number of scientists. Generally they really are concerned with finding out the 'truth' to the best of their ability. Yes there are examples of fraud, cheating, politicisation, and funding deficits for unpopular science - all true - doesn't suddenly make the large body of work that has been done showing anthropogenic-induced climate change is a serious threat to our planets environment (and therefore us) is all fake and made up, or poor science.

There is plenty of right wing media and right wing governments. If there was any credible science to dispute the current consensus than they would be touting it loud and clear and governments would not on a whole (both right and left) be moving to implement CO2 curbs. The fact is, there isn't.