lol - as if the right don't throw insults. Don't get hurt mate just because I point out your emotional ramblings are based on falsehoods.
Do you really think China and India have banned CFC's / NO2 / SO2?Um yeh dummy, they have. Recent reports shows a rise in use again from China but they have at least officially banned them and monitoring showed this was happening until more recently. And yeh, they don't want acid rain either.
China are building over 150 new coal powered plants...India came out a couple of years ago and said Coal is their energy future, it will help bring millions of underprivileged people out of poverty.Yep, and even if you think it's ok to pollute to allow developed nations to get up to speed with cheap power what has this got to do with your arguments around ozone layer and acid rain being some kind of hoax??? Don't conflate your issues big fella.
And dictator Dan in Victoria, well we close our only Coal powered plant to save the environment!Just highlighting that your stance has nothing to do with science or facts and is in fact your zealotry around political ideology. Stick to facts and the points I have raised
The stupidity of it all...energy costs in Australia going through the roof, yet we export coal to China and India for them to have cheap energy.Yes because those poor underprivileged that you now forgot to care about deserve access to cheap power that we as rich countries have had. Developed nations have been responsible for the vast majority of CO2 and other pollutants put in the atmosphere to date- so yes we have to do more to fix up the mess we created.
You do know there are esteemed Climate scientists who totally oppose the current 'cult' thinking and hysteria?Lol. Yes. 3% of them. And you, with no idea yourself, decided to go all in on believing the 3% that have divergent views to the vast majority. Why? Not because you applied any scientific analysis of your own and your own findings agreed with the 3%. Just because it suits your political ideology. Which just shows how dumb the sheeple are.
Imagine if 97% of scientists said burning coal was good for the planet and 3% said it wasn't. And I came on here quoting the 3% as though it was a valid reason to stop burning coal. You'd all laugh at me and call me a nutjob. You don't care about what scientists say if it is different to what you want to believe - and sadly that is usually about political ideology and nothing to do with what is the truth.
View attachment 5496079
(20min delay)