traffic fines for 4km/hr over, page-160

Any objective analysis about low tolerance insults our intellgence. Why? Because the safe 'limit' in any place is really variable. A 60 limit may be appropriate in daylight when fine, but at night in fog it may be lethal, yet the legal 'limit' remains the same.

So how can anyone say that 62 is an offence? 50 may be legal but extremely dangerous under some conditions.
The whole argument is assinine.

But in any event, where I live on a country highway, the focus on speeding is undoubtley causing deaths. When a B Double, of which there is one every 60 seconds day and night, - travelling legally at 100 pulls out in frustration to pass a car too scared to go above 92 in case they get 'caught', - it is the traffic coming the other way that has the problem, not the truck. I see this on a daily basis.