Interesting. Obviously not totally appropriate to compare underground mining of coal to the PGE deposit at Julimar.
The grades speak for themselves. It is why companies aren't falling over themselves to buy it. Don't get me wrong, amazing geology, lots of contained metal, just within an almighty large volume = low grade. The near surface oxide material is potentially interesting, but too small.
Perhaps there are discrete higher-grade domains that have been smoothed out in the mega go-for-tonnes model. Good enough for underground mining?
CHN Sale, page-210
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 151 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CHN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.38 |
Change
0.030(2.23%) |
Mkt cap ! $534.8M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.37 | $1.38 | $1.35 | $3.483M | 2.552M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8720 | $1.38 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.38 | 12464 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 27/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CHN (ASX) Chart |