IMO it means Tesla's sales and its pipeline of sales is strong. Tesla needs more hydroxide and to produce that it needs more Spod.
I don't think its consistent with the Telsa brand to enter into legal battles just because they can. I suspect is more around wanting to firm up their lithium supplies for future EV/SS production plans. The treat of litigation is just a tool (and a really good one) to strike a deal and get more lithium "...to the extent the parties are unable to mutually resolve this matter without litigation."
Ann: Equity Raise Presentation, page-23
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 25 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add CXO (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
11.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(4.17%) |
Mkt cap ! $246.4M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 11.5¢ | 12.0¢ | 11.3¢ | $1.220M | 10.57M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 110 | 6252092 | 11.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5¢ | 695532 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CXO (ASX) Chart |