Ann: Government of Mali - Update, page-180

@52570 HC glitch hence tag

Couldn't agree more with your sentiment but probably would have been better posting it on the LLL thread?
~ His comments today bears no resemblance to the same person that provided articulate and informative posts on the economics and metrics of the Goulamina project, he was also one of the Requisitioning Members that lobbied for the removal of Willisee & Bresser after they tried to sell the Li project for the princely sum of $109M.

@Ubique13 as we are talking about you, I tagged you in.

re: critical junction?
~ up until this announcement we were lead to believe that we had no liabilities for Morila SA, but we have engaged one of the worlds largest law firms to represent Firefinch in what the Company are having us believe are just "good faith" discussion?

re: cooler heads prevail so the existing board can wrap things up with the government swiftly?
~ suggest you have a listen to the recording of the AMG, Lowe's comments on how African country's law differs from what we would be accustomed to in Australia.
~ I can only assume that you think those that are voting in favour of all the resolutions are not making that decision with a balanced mind ie: being hotheaded?
~ wrap up swiftly and the existing board IMO do not go hand in hand, we walked away in November and nearly 10 months later we are still pouring money into Mali albeit by engaging the large law firm and having good faith discussions and yet we shareholders are none the wiser.
~ I still cannot fathom why, pro company supporters keep on referencing the Board have anything to do with the negotiations happening in Mali and that a new board would mysteriously cause all negotiations in both the sale of the shareholding of Morila SA and the Corporate Transaction for FFX to cease.

cheers

Voting to keep the current board is a vote to vindicate them of their performance that has seen a decimation of shareholder wealth, a write down to nil of A$220m core asset!