Ann: DVP: DVP & ESS Transformational Transaction, page-297

If you understand that MIN would want to benefit significantly on their 53mil shares, then why do you think they’d still be content with voting yes even though it would be obvious to them by doing so at today’s prices, they’d be losing significantly on their 53mil shares?

This should be fairly straightforward, even to the s&m fantasists on these threads who endlessly dream of feet on throats, if Tim had managed to demonstrate to the market an assurance that he would/could get that Li out of the Dome, we as shareholders, wouldn’t be stuck in between our current rock and hard place position.

I want to see progress. Will DVP management substantially provide that over Tim Spencer? I’m voting yes because Tim’s lack of timely progress has convinced me they will.

All IMO.