Ann: Bonanza Copper Hits and New Discovery at Storm, page-167

In your defense, I actually agree regarding Australian Sovereign risk. There has been some very short sighted decisions in Aus. as of late and this is a fair point to make. However, the history of nationalization in Latin American countries is also a fair point to make, at least from a historical perspective.

There are deep rooted cultural reasons for this which date back to original Spanish colonization and the strategies they employed.

As for AW1, it is in Canada. Which in your defense has also been making similar short sighted choices like Australia, however in the case of critical minerals it's unlikely they'll shoot themselves in the foot on this one for various political reasons.

As for if it's overvalued, let's be honest and admit we don't know if it's under or overvalued. We're going off visuals and still only have a fraction of the assays and drilling completed. This is a speculative stock that will take ages to drill out and prove into a proper resource. If that resource ends up being what those of us who are optimistic think it will be, then it's undervalued. If not, it's overvalued.

Trying to be balanced here and give you the benefit of the doubt since other posters assume you HCH guys are just here to cause trouble. I don't think that's entirely the case and we can have good discussion.