I'm surprised the board recommended a $3 bid. It sounded to me from their earlier comments that they were not selling at any price. I'd have thought something like $5 based on that would be what the were looking for.
On the ither hand:
A FCF of $2.5bn with 500 000t production implies a required profit of A$5000/t.
With current spodumene prices around US$3000(landed price), that is just not possible.
With underground mining it will be more expensive than open pit(PLS). Costs, royalties and taxes(eventually) will slice that FCF to closer to $1bn at the moment. That just means there is still reasonable value in it even at $3.
On the other hand there is execution risk. Just look at CXO. Up to $1.88, now down to 40c. Comment on PLS's history also that it is not easy to get spodumene production right. Maybe that makes the $3 bid a 505/50 call. I'm still surprised though that the board would recommend this as they seemed pretty optimistic just a couple of months ago that prior offers seriously undervalued LTR.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- LTR
- Ann: Revised Proposal from Albemarle
Ann: Revised Proposal from Albemarle, page-646
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 440 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LTR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
83.5¢ |
Change
-0.045(5.11%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.024B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
89.5¢ | 92.5¢ | 83.0¢ | $25.50M | 28.93M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 28887 | 83.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
84.0¢ | 22350 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
4 | 28887 | 0.835 |
7 | 38554 | 0.830 |
9 | 369834 | 0.825 |
8 | 218569 | 0.820 |
4 | 204020 | 0.815 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.840 | 22350 | 2 |
0.845 | 61294 | 4 |
0.850 | 144238 | 1 |
0.855 | 51000 | 2 |
0.860 | 58488 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 08/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
LTR (ASX) Chart |