Why are you so fixated by revenue split. Only reason SYA have NAL is because of PLL money.
Low valuation of SYA have little to do with revenue split but rather the choices BL took as CEO.
1. Games with ASX releases, trying to hide the price, which itself is not uncommon, but ridiculous when it would be known with no way to hide it because it is the first sale.
2. Not signing OT to full nameplate to fully fund the plant
3. Sudden CR without socialising the reason when the CR could have been done 30c plus
The OT with PLL for its time is likely not that bad, but with PLS/AKE we can't know because they have multiple
Ann: First Lithium Shipment Boosts NAL Revenues, page-260
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 89 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SYA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.4¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $349.9M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 3.4¢ | 3.4¢ | 3.3¢ | $739.5K | 22.19M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 25 | 10111792 | 3.3¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4¢ | 4951690 | 17 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 01/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SYA (ASX) Chart |