No one gets an automatic seat on a board. The BoD first have to approve a nomination and then SH's get to vote on that nomination. At the moment, ARL comprise 4 board members, 2 of which are independent and 2 non-independent. If a sub holder was to nominate and succeed in getting a seat, (it would be as a non-independent because of the SH'ing). That would then result in the BoD having a minority of independent dtors, which is contrary to the Corp gov Stmt. So the BoD could refuse to approve a nomination on that basis.
Whether one could also argue that a SH with holdings across a number of accounts and/or nominee accounts, doesn't satisfy the corporate world unwritten law (different to Sub holder/ASX requirements) is debatable.
Apparently Solomon Lew failed to gain a BoD seat (even though he had a substantial holding) in Coles a number of years ago. Again, that was from the Coles BoD not approving his nomination and recommending to SH's to vote against his inclusion.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ARL
- Ann: Becoming a substantial holder
Ann: Becoming a substantial holder, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ARL (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
47.0¢ |
Change
0.020(4.44%) |
Mkt cap ! $93.85M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
46.0¢ | 47.0¢ | 45.0¢ | $33.49K | 72.16K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 606 | 45.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
49.0¢ | 15000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 606 | 0.450 |
1 | 47552 | 0.445 |
2 | 6409 | 0.440 |
2 | 21150 | 0.435 |
1 | 1500 | 0.420 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.490 | 15000 | 1 |
0.520 | 10575 | 2 |
0.545 | 78038 | 1 |
0.560 | 15000 | 1 |
0.595 | 6009 | 1 |
Last trade - 15.53pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ARL (ASX) Chart |