interesting ?, page-7

Lets not lose sight of the facts known to us here.

Read the SOD post and it provides no specific statements or facts. It suggests that the massive loss of market capitalisation from a billion down to virtually squat is not a failing of the company but rather the work of some external meddling.

Unfortunately the post fails to provide any specific facts to support the insinuations. There are no specific statements that articulate the guts of the issue or what he believes happened.

Its obscure cloak and dagger stuff without any obvious reason. If you are going to come out and say something then you may as well make your point clearly I believe. If you were genuinely worried about the men in black then you wouldn't say anything in a public forum, let alone deliberately unveil your identity in what is supposed to be an anonymous medium.

Don't get me wrong, I'm completely open to the possibility that some of the conspiracy theories are true but this post is about as close to providing tangible evidence as the latest Elvis sighting. If the poster wishes to elaborate on his points or direct us to the relevant evidence then vindication may be possible for many who may have been wronged. Otherwise such speculation hangs as a cloud over the company and adds to the perceived likelihood of the inherent risks of investing in MST. Remember, as a shareholders, its your backyard too.

PS Conspiracy theories is not a criticism. Just remember that is what they are until proven. Prove them and you should have the backing of all shareholders.