growth factor, page-45

Hi pogues, (this was my ealier post with my 'holding' taken out)

Yes i agree with you, my issue was the errant mis information thats going on, there are no problems that we are aware of and anyone reading his posts could take it that this coy is in developmental trouble, which to my knowlege its not

i wont even entertain 'angrys' post, as its just backing up my statement that there are no known issues relating to what ausguy said

Why on earth would a holder (angry) condone mischeivous information about a coy he has a holding in i dont know, its like cutting off your nose to spite your face

I have a interest in this coy as i am a shareholder and others that i am aware of hold equal interest to me and more, so i will stand up for the coy when someone is posting erroneous information on the forum

If someone posts 'that there are difficulties' (which is what was said) as opposed to 'any machine in the world can have problems' but that is not the case here they mean two entirely different things

I will say it again, the company has not announced that there are any issues pushing back the rollout of these machines

What it did say is this

"Improvements have focused on the implementation of stainless steel augers, the use of improved materials in the cutters and sealing components, and improvements to the pressure vessel to increase its tolerance to corrosive substances in the harsh environment in which it operates."

Hardly challenging stuff, going from a mild steel auger to a Stainless Steel auger is a snap, changing materials in the cutters is again a snap etc and so on. From my knowledge of these components and what they are doing it is the opposite of challenging IMHO. But what would i know my factory has these components throughout it wherever you look.

The fact remains that ausguy was saying it was the case, rather than saying IMHO. If 'angry' wants to bring it down to semantics go for it, i will keep referring to the ann.

The coy actually knows whats going on as opposed to a HC poster saying what he thinks as fact and seemingly trying to scalp a point or two.

The coy has not indicated that this project is falling behind.

Further when coys provide timelines they also factor in bedding down time, (unless its the A380 being made on 3 continents, this is not the case here.) so how do any of us know how much time has been allowed for problems??? it may well be factored in already

I could have just TOU'd the post/s as a downramp, but thats not why i brought it up.